A suspended police corporal has claimed trial at the Sessions Court in Ampang today over two charges of allegedly sexually assaulting his 11-year-old daughter.
The 35-year-old father of four pleaded not guilty after the charges were read before Judge Norshila Kamarudin.
The accused, who was a person in a position of trust as the victim’s father, was charged with committing physical sexual assault against the child for sexual purposes.
The alleged offences took place at a house in Kuala Kubu Bharu, Rawang, between 9pm and 10pm on May 21, and around 2pm the following day.
He was charged under Section 14(b) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, which carries a maximum jail term of 20 years and whipping upon conviction. He also faces additional provisions under Section 16(1), which carries imprisonment of up to five years and a minimum of two strokes of the cane.
Prosecution objects to bail
Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhammad Hairuliqram Hairuddin objected to bail, telling the court that the accused was already facing a separate rape charge involving his eldest daughter, who was 18 years old at the time of the alleged offence.
The court was told that after the accused was granted bail in the earlier case, the victim’s family lodged a complaint alleging that he had harassed the teenager.
The prosecution argued that there were concerns the accused could attempt to contact the victims if released.
Defence appeals for bail on medical grounds
Defence counsel Muhammad Azim Hilmi Aziz argued that the current charges were separate from the earlier case and said his client no longer lived with either alleged victim.
He also requested bail on medical grounds, saying the accused was receiving psychiatric treatment at Hospital Bahagia Ulu Kinta in Perak and required medication.
The defence said the accused’s mother was prepared to act as a surety and ensure his attendance in court.
However, Judge Norshila rejected the bail application, citing concerns over the alleged harassment complaint and the need to prevent any contact with the victims. The judge said bail could only be reconsidered if the defence provided a suitable surety who could guarantee the accused’s attendance and compliance with court conditions.
The court fixed Aug 26 for the next case management and submission of documents relating to a possible surety.
Follow Wah Piang for more.
